Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 00:01

Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Have Dakota Johnson and Chris Martin Consciously Uncoupled? - The Cut
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
How the Indiana Pacers Spun Style Into Substance - The Ringer
Just in the last 5 years:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
James Cook faces the heat from Bills beat reporters - Buffalo Rumblings
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Thank you.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What’s next?
Anthony Richardson sidelined by shoulder injury - NBC Sports
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
O'Malley's dad 'super relaxed' cornering title bout - ESPN
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
I'm British and feel ashamed of the crimes of British colonialism. What should I do?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Can AI render a high resolution image from a low resolution image?